Month: March 2019

Home / Month: March 2019

We’re now living in a visual age. Images are now shaping international events as well as our own understanding of them. Television, cinema and photos have significant influence on how we are viewing and approaching phenomena that is as diverse as humanitarian disasters, war, financial crises, protest movements and even election campaigns.

With regards to visual politics, the dynamics have gone beyond conventional media outlets. Digital media from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and the likes does play a critical role in political spectrum ranging from social justice campaigns to terrorist recruitment drives. Whether you like it or not, images are surrounding everything we do.

Its omnipresence is political and has fundamentally changed how we are living and interacting in today’s time.

These very same images like صور اطفال or kids pictures are what dividing the House of Representatives into two parties or otherwise known as the Liberal and Democrats. Yes. We’ve been hearing about them but have you ever thought how the two are different from each other?

A Thin Line between Two Parties

Liberal is someone who does believe in liberalism which is both a ideological and political philosophy. These liberals have broad viewpoints but oftentimes support equality and freedom. These may range from gender equality to freedom of speech.

As a matter of fact, it’s been around since 14th or 15th century throughout the Renaissance period wherein liberal concept started to gain prominence. Throughout history, the liberals show full support on progressive viewpoints that are in favor of fairness and equality.

The first few liberal points of view were the push needed for freedom of religion and democracy which is then followed by the classical liberalism and supported the banning of serfdom and slavery, colonial independence and better working conditions.

Once the goals were attained, liberal views were retargeted to favoring civil rights, women’s suffrage and continuous progression.

Democrats on the other hand are the ones who are supporting the Democratic Party and do not reference their beliefs and ideology. If for example the Democratic Party has conservative point of view, then democrats must apply the same notion as well. In US nowadays, Democratic Party has modern liberal views and therefore, the Democrats are sometimes considered liberal as well.

The Silver Lining

The difference between the two will only be noticeable when you go out of US mainstream politics. Communists and socialists are liberal so does European liberals. Both of the said groups have their liberal views but are not Democrats as they are not participating in US politics as well as Democratic Party. Thus, most Democrats can be liberal but you can’t say that not all liberals are Democrats.

At the end of the day, both parties’ goal is to improve the living conditions and enhance safety and security of their people.

Why Politicians Tie Their Wallets

March 26, 2019 | Politics | No Comments

Hillary Clinton used a deceptively simple outfit when she went in of the stage in U.S.A to receive her party’s nomination for president. Its flawless tailoring says Clinton’s authority; its cold and snowing whiteness hooked her to the suffragette motion; and, with no artist asserting it, the suit looks to transcend fashion, it is own to each woman. Truer words have infrequently been written. A handbag is not a wallet, and pockets – more than jeans, more than neckties, more than briefs, also more than suits – are the fantastic garments gender divide. Pockets are political, but likely it is not the way you expected it.

During Medieval Time. Before, all women carried bag, during medieval time. Both Women’s and Men politicians tie their bags on their waste or hang them from their belts. And it will look like vintage packs. As the world looks like a countryside the world grew more urban and criminals more worldly. People hide their wallet (click here) inside their clothes to avoid criminals(thieves) grabbing it from them. Men’s jacket and Women’s coats are designed by a good designer that allowed you to tie your wallets on your waste.

During The Late Seventies. In the late seventies, wallets made their moves to become part of a men’s fashion, permanently sewn and it’s attached with their coats and trousers including women’s wallet.

The French Revolution. The French Revolution changed everything. While in the mid 18th-century heap in Venice, wide skirts that screamed dissipation and prosperity in yards of fabric. After the 18th century. Skirts are worn and tied exactly to your waste, and natural waste moves upward, and the shadow thinned to a willowy column. This classical look had no space for wallets, however, women still carry their stuff. The dots, a small embellish was born and like a harmful apparition, it has never gone away.

Wallets That Politicians Will Probably Love 

 

An Apostille is the verification of the originality of a public document and is only conferred by a appointed juridiction of the country which provide the document. The German Missions can’t issue Apostilles.

In the US the Apostille for public certificate such as birth or marriage certificates is given by the Secretary from where the certificates derived.

Republic Of Germany Public Documents

In the Federal Republic of Germany, the following agencies issue also known as the“Hague Apostille” for German public documents:

1. Federal Documents

Exception: For Federal government Patents Court and German Copywright Office documents, the president will give the Apostille.

2. German State Documents

In Germany, they don’t handled juridisction with a consistent manner. For this cause, if you are not sure which office can issue an Apostille in your particular case, please call the authority in Germany which initially issued the document.

Generally speaking, the following figure are proficient authorities:

Documents of Administrative Authorities (excluding Judicial Administrative Authorities): Interior agencies (the sanate sector), regional administrator, local administration;

  • Berlin: State Office for Residence and Regulatory Affairs;
  • Lower Saxony: Police headquarters in Braunschweig, Göttingen, Hannover,
  • Lüneburg, Oldenburg, and Osnabrück;
  • Rhineland-Westphalia: Supervisory and service directorate in Kaiserslautern;
  • Saxony: State directorates in Chemnitz, Dresden, and Leipzig;
  • Saxony-Anhalt: State administrative office in Magdeburg;
  • Thuringia: State administrative office in Weimar.

Documents of Judicial Managerial Authorities, Courts of General Authority (Civil and Criminal Courts), and Notaries:

Justice department (senate sectors), chief justices of state or the admin courts.
Documents of Courts aside from Those of General Jurisdiction:
Interior department orsenate sector, regional committee, regional admin, justice department (senate sector), chief justices of state or the managerial legal courts.

Apostille: Germany Guide

If you will need an apostille in the Federal government of Germany, please contact the following organizations liable with this service:

Federal documents:

  • For documents that was issued by the federal authority and courts, except those stated below and contact Federal Office of Administration
  • For issued documents by the FPC(Federal Patent Court) you must contact the German President Office.

Documents that was been issued by the German Lander

  • It’s because the distribution of “Hague apostilles” is not evenly managed in the different Länder, it is better to check each document, which authority is appointed to issue an apostille for that certain kind of of document.

Apostille: European Union. No Longer Required On Public Documents

Health and wellness goes beyond health care, whether provided by public or private medical facilities and professionals, like Dr. Theodore A DaCosta. Although health care accessibility is an influencing aspect, human conduct, as well as the social, physical, and economic atmosphere and circumstances where we reside and work are other main factors of health.

Public Policies – What Do They Do?

As an outcome of these driving factors, policies on health also goes beyond just health care policy.

The field of public policy is massive since it is a structure of laws, measures for regulations, avenues of action, as well as priorities for funding put into effect by agencies or representatives of the government.

Although there might be debates and deliberations regarding role and magnitude of the government, public policies could and does play an essential part in life of many.

Influence of Public Policy On Health

Public policies that don’t seem to be related to health to begin with, could have a weighty impact on health and health care by touching the mentioned drivers. Public policies, regulations, programs, and public services form and affect our environments physically, socially, and economically. Additionally, they produce opportunities as well as incentives that prompt human behaviors.

Establish Requisites and Directives That Protect Citizens

For instance, one of the primary reasons of injuries and mortalities are accidents related to traffic. Enforced laws pertaining to the obligatory use of seat belts were carried out to deal with this problem. These implemented laws have improved the utilization of seat belts and have lessened vehicle-related casualties. Another example of public policies formulated to protect the lives of citizens are laws related to driving whilst under the influence of alcohol.

Standardizes and Systematizes the Use of Natural Resources to Avert Harm

The Department of Environment and Conservation of Tennessee controls and normalizes the quality of air and water to make certain its safety. Numerous people in the society assume that the air they inhale and water they sip is safe and health-giving, however contact to pollution or tainted drinking water is a weighty factor to health problems like asthma as well as illness from contaminated water.

Offers Direct Support in Ways That Shape Health Drivers

For example, in 1996, the U.S. Congress created a program that is supported and funded by both the state and federal governments and aids unfortunate families achieve self-sufficiency and self-reliance through employment. The program granted momentary funding assistance to help these poor families meet the expense of basic necessities like sustenance and shelter, at the same time as making available opportunities for job training and employment.

Keeping Politics Minimal In Video Games

March 18, 2019 | Politics | No Comments

The majority of video games are by nature political. Probably they are nation-wide politics you go along with and do not ponder over it – however are. Video games are somehow being tagged political to cover the blatant blow of these games to the political reality that nations are facing.

Video games like Call of Duty, Battlefield, and the Rise of Kingdoms (formerly Rise of Civilizations) are a few popular games that are somewhat political in nature but obviously silhouetted in a video game. These games portrayed the western powers as the good guys and the nameless characters that are close to middle eastern in looks are the bad guys. Honestly, that is coldly imperialist diffusion embedded in video games. Many adults say they enjoy the game but they also acknowledge that the entire scenario of the game is politically related.

While kids who have little knowledge about politics do not realize this fact hidden behind these games, the adults and even young adults know this for a fact. But after all, it is just a game.

Stop Politicizing Video Games

So keep politics the way it is and keep video games just games. The truth is, when you keep politics out of video games, you are also taking away the excitement and the story plot behind these games. Therefore, the game will be as dull as a game for toddlers. These injected political, socio-political and socio-economic scenarios in video games are eye-openers. Not for a kid but for many teens to adults. But at the same time, these games give the opportunity to average citizens to strategize a game plan, to understand what’s really happening in our society, and how to make small changes in our own power.

The question is should we keep politics from video games?

The question is simple but in all angles difficult, entertainment wise and reality wise. But is it possible? The answer is half and half for the main reason that in reality politics is everywhere. It’s present within the family, the neighborhood, in school, and even in simple little organizations. So yes, you can keep a game far from politics as possible but it can always revert back to being political in some angles.

You see, politics is something that we can’t really avoid but it is something that we have to accept and dance with. Keep politics at minimum is perhaps a better choice of words if you really want to keep some games at least kid-friendly and somewhat acceptable in the eyes of the majority.

It is quite ironic how widespread adoption of hardline anti-immigration policies gained major political support during the Age of Globalization.

Migration policies received little attention several decades after World War Ii in light of past racial actions taken by Hitler during his Nazi regime. However, growth in immigrant population that produced workers with similar and in some cases exceptional skills created perceptions of potential threats to the dominant group in terms of national identity, rights to welfare, and political influence. So much so that continuing increases spawned negative views and attitudes toward future acceptance of immigrants.

The 9/11 Attack added another aspect to the growing antipathy toward immigrants particularly to those coming from Middle Eastern nations. Muslim communities were being stereotyped as harborers, supporters or members of religious fanatics engaged in terrorist activities.

Moreover, negative sentiments received encouragement from major national leaders like Trump. The US president issued an executive order banning or restricting entry to the US, of Iranian, Libyan, Syrian, Yemen, Somalian and Venezuelan citizens.

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison initiated a hardline stance against incoming refugees. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Nicolas Sarkozy were one in saying that the application of the principles of multiculturalism to a nation’s migration policy only spelled failure.

What is Multiculturalism and How is the Principle Applied to Migration Policies

The principle of multiculturalism believes that people from countries with differing cultures, religious beliefs, and linguistic backgrounds can exist peacefully in a country where there is general acceptance, tolerance and respect for every cultural or ethnic group. A multicultural country constitutes the natural born citizens as the dominant group and the different migrants as the minority group.

In applying the principle of multiculturalism, there should be laws protecting the rights of both the dominant group and that of each sub-cultural minority, especially in practicing their beliefs and traditions. It is also just for minority groups to expect equal recognition for their contributions to the country, and at the same time perform the same duties and responsibilities carried out by the dominant group.

The country on the other hand, must institute relevant and timely policies that will address any applications for citizenship that will absorb minority group members as naturalized citizens of the dominant group.

For many years, immigration in the Unites States has been politically debated on where policymakers need to consider battling humanitarian concerns as well as economic and security concerns. And for years, Congress has not been able to come up with s settlement on comprehensive reforms on immigration, moving several major policy verdicts into the policy-making and legal branches of government effectively and powering discussion in state and municipal governments. Thus, immigration lawyers such as the abogado de inmigracion las vegas have to be well-informed and updated with all revised immigration policies.

President Trump was voted on pledges to carry out great actions to curtail illegal immigration as well as to put a stop to terrorism, counting his plans to deport undocumented immigrants, build the boundary wall with Mexico, and for the time being ban Muslims. In office, he has downsized his plans in certain areas and moved forward in others with full force which frequently draws legal disputes and civic protest.

Immigration Populace In The United States

14% of the United States population comprises immigrants, where over 43 million of 323 million are immigrants as per data of the Census Bureau. Immigrants as well as their children born in the U.S. add up to about 27% of residents in the U.S. The number denotes a continual growth from 1970, where there were less than 10 million U.S. immigrants then.

Thousands of people legally work in the United States under numerous types of nonimmigrant visas. In 2017, the U.S. approved nearly 180,000 H1B visas or visas for high-skilled workers, and visas to almost 250,000 for temporary workers in the industry of agriculture and others. Every year, H1B visas are topped at 85,000 with exceptions for specific fields.

Congress Legislation In Recent Years

Over a couple of decades, Congress has contested on various parts of immigration reform, where several were deemed as “comprehensive.” Immigration reform that is comprehensive stand for omnibus legislation that make an attempt to tackle issues like the need for high and low skilled employment, the legal standing of the millions of immigrants residing in the country who are undocumented, border security, as well as interior enforcement.

The year 2013 was the last time policymakers came close to substantial immigration reform when the Senate, which was Democrat-led, passed a comprehensive reform bill that could have presented a way for undocumented immigrants to citizenship and provisions for challenging border security. The bill didn’t obtain a vote in the House of Representatives which is Republican-controlled.

If you’re moving into bigger spaces then it’s a indication of developing company but before getting too excited about those details. You need to confront another dilemma that’s leaving a location looking like the day that you walked inside.

End of rental cleaning is a very important component that many companies don’t pay heed to.

It’s not incorrect to state that leasing cleaning is equally as important element of moving out procedure as establishing in fresh location. This facet is no matter how much equipments have been transferred and what number of men and women will move. A lot of individuals don’t clean up a location since they don’t have sufficient time. This is the area where rental cleaning companies play their role.

The majority of the moment, it’s a component of this arrangement that if you may depart, you’d clean up the area. However, when you’re in fact leaving, you’re paying attention to many distinct tasks at precisely exactly the exact identical period and cleaning is most likely the very last thing in mind. You’re mostly focusing on packaging paperwork and equipments. In the event you choose to employ one of those cleaning solutions then it’s possible to enjoy numerous advantages. These solutions permit you to remain refreshed and ready to carry on setup of fresh location. Anyway, the rental cleaning solutions often produce better outcomes.

End of lease cleaners Melbourne business make certain you depart a sparkling workplace – assisting you cross check which you aren’t forgetting anything else behind. You’d have the ability to see everything as the space wouldn’t be filled with debris, garbage or some other crap.


You’d feel more assured in your packaging and moving skills, and of course the delight feeling in your choice to select one of those expert rental cleaning solutions.


You ought to know about the simple fact that a company’s history follows it around either it enjoys it or not. Consequently, if you go outside and leave a location untidy behind then it’s very likely to be discovered by somebody, it may do you unspeakable harm and without your knowing. So, better part of the offices wish a fantastic impression. It’s possible by choosing help from specialist rental cleaning solutions. These solutions would also assist you in conjunction with the collection parameters of initial rental cleaning to its whole scope.

Nowadays, locating a rental cleaning service is no issue. Problem arises when you’re on the lookout for quite a reputed and skilled support. There are many choices that the majority of the time folks are bewildered about the choice criteria. Fundamentally they need to start looking for a business with some expertise and decent gear.

We have so much to talk about nowadays when it comes to politics, and you expect that you and your own friends (and even your own family) can have opposite views regarding the pressing issues that have shaken our country. Regardless of what your opinion is, all of us have the right to express our thoughts, especially if we feel that certain rules in place are already impacting us negatively. The freedom of speech gives us protection to speak our minds, even if it means that we have to criticize the actions of our government.

Unfortunately, it appears that political dissent is not very much welcome in many nations. It depends on the country and its government’s tolerance on criticisms, but if you’ve been watching the news lately, you would know that talking against the highest governing body of the land will bring you nowhere. In fact, you will be painted as anti-government or someone who is up for a destabilization plot.

What Is Political Dissent?

We always have our say regarding different matters, like in music, fashion, and business. Also, as a citizen and taxpayer, we can freely give our comments on how the government is handling things in our country.

As a contributing member of the state, political affairs do have big effect on our lives, and it is only normal for us to speak if we find something that we like, or hate, in the system.

If we express disagreement towards the government, that is what we can call a political dissent. This refers to any action that sends a message of dissatisfaction to a governing body, particularly on the set of rules and policies that it has been implementing.

If you are in a democratic country, political dissent can be seen as part of its citizens’ human rights. Groups can stage non-violent demonstrations and any form of action that shows disagreement with some government rulings or policies, and they should not be held accountable or punished for that.

Of course, it is important that we recognize and respect our differences in views and beliefs, and we shouldn’t take that against each other. However, if we are talking about building a high-quality house, we should not settle for less. Contact only the best contractors and fort worth roofing companies in town.


Can Political Dissent Go Too Far? And How Should The Government Treat Opposition?

Political dissent is heavily based on our right to free speech, so speaking against certain policies in the government should never be used against us in any way. Only repressive governments and dictatorships can deem political dissent as anti-government and send people to jail just for expressing their opinion. It can go as ridiculous as putting you behind bars when you are merely asking for clean and safe water to drink.

Countering political dissent does not only mean physically restricting the one who is expressing it. Take the feedback that Captain Marvel is receiving due to its supposed political agenda as an example. There are many ways for a person or a group to be silenced, and one way is to bombard them with degrading remarks so that their message can never be heard.

Although, there is a limitation in expressing our political dissent. If it already verges on harming the lives of others, then we have a problem.

 

The Side Effect Of Steroids In Athletes and Politicians

Kids and Teens like to become professional athletes, and why not? It’s fun to imagine about, you using your sports attire and being the best in your favorite sports attire, not to mention gaining big earnings.

But in the latest years, people have been inspecting more the way some of the athletes want a perfect body shape- hard enough to break a record.

Some athletes and politicians admitted that they are using steroids, which improve their strength and muscle mass and also artificial hormones. Steroids are illegal and can cause a serious health problems but research shows that kids and teens like to try them.

Let us discuss what steroids is all about, how is it dangerous to your body, and why it is good to stay away from them.

Dangers of Steroids

Anabolic steroids (Hier kicken) can cause a lot of different kind of conditions. Less crucial side effect include acne, oily hair, purple or red spots on the body, swelling of the legs and feet, and bad breath. A kid or teen who takes anabolic steroids has a possibility that he/she will not grow as tall as they were supposed to grow.

Other serious and long-lasting side effects are:

  • Premature balding
  • Nausea
  • Mood swings
  • Hallucinations
  • Extreme feelings of mistrust or fear
  • Anxiety
  • Vomiting
  • Trembling
  • High blood pressure that can probably hurt the heart or blood vessels over time
  • Aching joints
  • Greater chance of injuring muscles and tendons
  • Yellowing of skin; liver damage
  • U.T.I
  • Increased risk of developing heart disease, stroke, and some types of cancer

What Are Steroids?

“Steroids” has two definition. Our body produce natural steroids, to help our body from stress and us to grow fast during puberty. (But our body produce a right amount of steroids so our body does not need and no need take any extra.) There is these type of medicine called “steroids” that others take if they have difficulties in breathing, pain, or skin problem. But these steroids is different from what athletes use.

The Danger Of Using Steroids 

http://www.antiescualidos.com/

Sport is game of two or more individuals competing with each other. Often, people always seem to enjoy this kind of competition. Nowadays, sport is considered as battles of the modern times.

One example of this sport battle is the modern tennis match. However, in this modern gladiator battle, bloodless competition is taken over with harmless weapon such as the tennis racquets. To be able to win over this battle, one must need to use the best tennis racquets in town.

The Beginning of the Tennis Battle

This sport battle usually begins by securing the player’s lives through attainment of points. Every single point in a tennis match signifies the intention of one player to kill or win over his opponent.

In the event that all the points of one player are completed, the battle moves on to the next level. The player has to achieve an appropriate number of points during the battle in order to be declared as the winner.

Moreover, the moment the game starts to heat up, it is very evident to the players and the audience as well. This generally happens the moment both opponents tend to show up their amazing moves.

Compared to a real battle, those moves are very similar to every swipes of weapon or player’s defence moves. Moments like these start to keep the adrenaline rushing out of each player and even from each audience.

The moment the player won the battle, his victory is symbolizes by a raising fist in the air. People who watch this battle also do the same to signify their support to the victor.

The War of Words

Generally, an individual’s desire to fight and be a victor lies from various areas other than sport. One of which is politics where the words of each officials and staffs behind the administration or opposition are the strongest weapons.

Best example of this kind of war is between the word war of the conservative versus the liberal talk shows. As their war intensifies to the next level, each host creates the greatest word to take off the opposition.

Just like what Rush Limbaugh wants to do. He do not simply aim to win against the liberal, what he really wants is to defeat them.

For so many times that I always point out the definition of liberalism to be clear that this people really hate the country.

This innate nature of people to battle against each other has been taken over into the field of politics and sport. Moreover, moving politics into sport is one way to create a future for political campaign.

Current US immigration policies mirror the shifts outlined by Catherine Dauvergne in her book “The New Politics of Immigration and the End of Settler Society.” Ms. Dauvergne is Dean and Law Professor at the Peter A. Allard School of Law at Canada’s University of British Columbia. Her literary works are based on her research work as a fellow of the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation, delving mainly on migration, refugee, Canada’s citizenship laws and policies, all in relation to the changing landscape of global migration.

As a citizen of a country that welcomes multicultural migration, it is worth mentioning that the politics governing Canada’s immigration policies stands in contrast to that of other major countries. The Canadian government considers its share of immigrants as significant, acknowledging their contributions in enhancing the prosperity of the country. At the same time, Canada encourages reuniting migrants with their family, and also offers refuge and protection to the unfortunates who have been displaced or persecuted in their countries of origin.

In citing the shifts in global migration politics mentioned by Ms.Dauvergne, we cannot help but relate the changes to the constantly evolving migration policies in the US. Where in previous administrations, the influx of immigrants was not a cause for concern, certain factors have brought on changes that altered immigrant status quo in the US soil.

Changes in Global Immigration Policies Outlined in “The New Politics of Immigration and the End of Settler Society.”

According to Ms. Dauvergne, her writing aims to point out the past and present as a way of providing a bigger picture on which to build forthcoming modifications in immigration regulations. Here, she refers to Australia, Canada, USA and New Zealand as “settler societies”, nations founded on large concentrations of immigrants that later called for the institution of migration regulations.

Asylum Seekers and the Global Asylum Crisis

The first shift occurred as a result of global asylum crisis. War and domestic conflicts in some countries had brought on asylum seekers to well-known “settler societies.” However, the constantly increasing number of asylum seekers had meant additional government spends, which more often than not, was not part of the government’s annual plans and appropriations.

The 9/11 Attacks and the Rise of Islamophobia

The September 11 attacks fueled anti-immigrant sentiments particularly for those coming from Islamic countries. As the US government asserted itself as still a major power to contend with, the so-called “War on Terror” was waged against Islamic countries suspected of harboring and/or conspiring with the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda.

In the US, heightened securitizations at airports and massive detention of Muslim immigrants rubbed off a sense of fear, or feelings of prejudice and hatred for Muslims in general, known as islamophobia.

End of Settler Societies and Loss of Multiculturalism

The events of the past, eventually led to the breakdown of multicultural ideology, in which every race making up a community is regarded as equals in terms of rights and opportunities. The policies that evolved thereafter became harsher, as in the case of those imposed by the Trump administration.

Ms. Dauvergne’s earlier observations turned out to be a foretelling of harsher immigration politics. As head of a country that was largely founded by immigrants, Donald Trump made clear his stance against multiculturalism; blaming immigrants for rises in criminality, loss of employment and acts of terrorism.

There are only a few days left before the next big installment of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) hits the theaters. Unlike any other feature movies in the MCU, “Captain Marvel” is considered as a game-changer by the Marvel fans, being the first MCU film to showcase a solo female superhero.

While many fans have waited for so long to see Captain Marvel on the big screen, there are some people who seem to be not quite happy with her arrival. The reason for their lack of enthusiasm is the issue that the movie will be all too political. Fanboys are not happy with how “Captain Marvel” has been promoted for the past couple of months due to its underlying political agenda, which is obviously centered on feminism. However, should politics get in the way of people enjoying a quality movie? Is it actually the politics that bother the viewers, or is it their deep-rooted personal beliefs and issues that are challenged?

Why ‘Captain Marvel’ Suddenly Become The Least Anticipated MCU Film?

If you have been following Rotten Tomatoes (RT) for the early reviews of upcoming movies, you might have already seen the “Want-to-See” rating of “Captain Marvel” plummeting from 100% to a tragic 27%. The reason behind this is the huge number of online trolls giving a negative rating on the movie, and fortunately RT saw through these trolls’ agenda and made the rating hidden. To be clear, this is not yet the critics’ score for the actual film, but only the rating given by the viewers if they are interested to watch it.

Even without asking all those RT trolls about their reasoning for giving “Captain Marvel” a thumbs down before watching the film, the reaction of some people is already evident regarding the movie’s theme. Judging by the trailers, you can say that “Captain Marvel” advocates for women empowerment. The fact that it is the first solo female superhero movie in MCU is a message in itself. It is also very well-known that actress Brie Larson, who bagged the titular character, is vocal about her political stand, especially about the lack of female representation in Hollywood.

The fanboys do not appear to be fine with how “Captain Marvel” is shaping up to be. According to some MCU fans, they do not need a preachy protest movie that calls out all the wrong in the world. Although, what appears to be the real reason for them not liking the movie is the central theme itself, which is feminism. It is also worth noting that Larson wants to see a more inclusive press panel for the movie, as she thinks that the previous movie press cons have been all white males. For the MCU fanbase that is predominantly male, this kind of ideas and statements already sounds like an attack to their very existence. Thus, the backlash ensues.


So ‘Captain Marvel’ Is All For Feminism, But Should We Frown On That?

Even without the political correctness that some people are sensitive of, we can expect the same intense action sequences from “Captain Marvel,” as every other films from the MCU had given us. From the trailer itself, we can see Larson’s character soaring high in the sky as she singlehandedly obliterate what appears to be an enemy spacecraft that is inflitrating Earth’s atmosphere. No one knows where that spaceship will crash, but hopefully it won’t end up crashing down a residential area or else we will a good roofing company fort worth to fix the damages.

If the cast and crew of “Captain Marvel” wants to give women a time to shine, why should we be angry about it? For a typical guy who always hears the call for woman finally getting recognition and be seen as equal of a man, the message can be sort of annoying. We can only imagine how the trailers made the fanboys’ blood boil. However, it is not the film’s intention to discredit anybody steal anything from one gender and place them to another.

Lastly, whether we like it or not, everything around us can be political. Not only movies and television series have a history of injecting a dose of politics to their contents, as most video games today also have huge political setting built around them.