Author: Brenna Seward

Home / Author: Brenna Seward

When two commercial entities have entered in a contractual relationship, the contracts they make is automatically regulated by the UCC or Uniform Commercial Code and common law of the relevant state to which the contract is applied. So long as the contract isn’t violating public policy and following the law, these commercial firms are allowed to get into a contract.

Even so, there will be a totally different set of rules to be applied and there are varieties of regulatory statutes and requirements that do exist. These things are setting the parameters for the contractual relationship.

How Come Government Contracts are Different?

Whenever a contract is set by two private firms, they spend money or sometimes, the money of their shareholders. Of course, there are laws that are protecting the shareholders which include the requirements that the executives and the board members act in the best interests of the firm.

The private contracts that take place between commercial entities are made as per the decisions of the business which is influenced by free-market principles.

Even if the contract made goes south and the shareholders or business lose money on the process, this is a risk that they partake as part of business operation or the investment they made.

But when the federal government has entered a contract, the money they’re using has come directly from taxpayers. In comparison to investors in public company, taxpayers don’t have a say or power to decide whether to invest their tax money in a project or not. It is the people in the government who makes the final decision.

On the other hand, between the two, they have a common denominator. It’s the fact that both commercial firms and the federal government utilizes contract management system to ensure a smooth sail of every contract they get into.

Government Contracts, Cause…

With government contracts, these are subject to laws to which private contracts aren’t. To give you an example:

  • Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 which governs non-land property as well as construction company acquisition by government agencies
  • Armed Services Procurement Act of 1947 that regulates the acquisition of non-land property and construction services by the defense agencies
  • Competition in Contracting Act or an act that seeks open competition before awarding a contract except in limited circumstances

We’re now living in a visual age. Images are now shaping international events as well as our own understanding of them. Television, cinema and photos have significant influence on how we are viewing and approaching phenomena that is as diverse as humanitarian disasters, war, financial crises, protest movements and even election campaigns.

With regards to visual politics, the dynamics have gone beyond conventional media outlets. Digital media from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and the likes does play a critical role in political spectrum ranging from social justice campaigns to terrorist recruitment drives. Whether you like it or not, images are surrounding everything we do.

Its omnipresence is political and has fundamentally changed how we are living and interacting in today’s time.

These very same images like صور اطفال or kids pictures are what dividing the House of Representatives into two parties or otherwise known as the Liberal and Democrats. Yes. We’ve been hearing about them but have you ever thought how the two are different from each other?

A Thin Line between Two Parties

Liberal is someone who does believe in liberalism which is both a ideological and political philosophy. These liberals have broad viewpoints but oftentimes support equality and freedom. These may range from gender equality to freedom of speech.

As a matter of fact, it’s been around since 14th or 15th century throughout the Renaissance period wherein liberal concept started to gain prominence. Throughout history, the liberals show full support on progressive viewpoints that are in favor of fairness and equality.

The first few liberal points of view were the push needed for freedom of religion and democracy which is then followed by the classical liberalism and supported the banning of serfdom and slavery, colonial independence and better working conditions.

Once the goals were attained, liberal views were retargeted to favoring civil rights, women’s suffrage and continuous progression.

Democrats on the other hand are the ones who are supporting the Democratic Party and do not reference their beliefs and ideology. If for example the Democratic Party has conservative point of view, then democrats must apply the same notion as well. In US nowadays, Democratic Party has modern liberal views and therefore, the Democrats are sometimes considered liberal as well.

The Silver Lining

The difference between the two will only be noticeable when you go out of US mainstream politics. Communists and socialists are liberal so does European liberals. Both of the said groups have their liberal views but are not Democrats as they are not participating in US politics as well as Democratic Party. Thus, most Democrats can be liberal but you can’t say that not all liberals are Democrats.

At the end of the day, both parties’ goal is to improve the living conditions and enhance safety and security of their people.